|
Tamil
Learning Act
·
On February
18, 2008
Supreme
Court
rejected
petitions
challenging
a
legislation
passed by
the Tamil
Nadu
government
making Tamil
a compulsory
subject from
Standards I
to X in all
schools in
the State
from
academic
year
2006-2007.
·
Leave
petitions
was filed by
the
Kanyakumari
District
Malayala
Samajam and
the
Yogakshema
Sabha,
Kanyakumari,
against a
Madras High
Court
judgment
upholding
the
constitutional
validity of
the law.
·
Justice
Pasayat
cited an
earlier apex
court
judgment,
which had
said
that
resistance
to learn
local
language
would not be
in the
interest of
the
country’s
unity.
Learning the
local
language
would be in
the interest
of the child.
·
The
petitioners
challenged
Tamil Nadu
Tamil
Learning Act
2006
gazetted on
June 12,
2006. While
making
compulsory
Tamil as the
first
language and
English, the
second
language, it
made study
of any other
language by
students who
had neither
Tamil nor
English as
their mother
tongue
optional.
·
Under the
law,
Tamil was
made
compulsory
for students
of Standard
I from
academic
year
2006-07.
·
They must
learn Tamil
as
compulsory
language in
the
subsequent
years and
continue to
do so till
Standard X.
·
Counsels
contended
that the law
curtailed
the
unfettered
rights of
minority
institutions
to establish
and
administer
educational
institutions
of their
choice
guaranteed
under
Articles 29
and 30 of
the
Constitution.
·
They argued
that
introduction
of a foreign
language to
children of
tender age
was not
desirable
and cited
the examples
of
Maharashtra
and
Karnataka,
where
learning of
Marathi and
Kannada had
been made
compulsory
from fifth
standard
onwards.
|